Republicans rejoice Trump -Teaching rates when their voters support for pain

Republicans in Congress rush to praise President Trump’s plan to impose both allies and opponents, even those from agricultural states whose voters lose most from a trade war.

The outflow of praise, which is pepped only with a few cases of carefully formulated skepticism, is another indication that there is unlikely to be any regulatory resistance to Trump’s unilateral movement.

Saturday night, barely five minutes after Mr. Trump posted about the tariffs he had just signed an executive order for, representative Glenn Thompson, a Pennsylvania Republican who heads the house’s agricultural committee, praised the decision as an “effective tool” to “secure fair trade for American producers.”

“Look no further than Colombia’s reverse by accepting repatriated criminal migrants at the mere threat of customs,” said Mr. Thompson from Pennsylvania.

The agricultural panel’s feed on social media was filled with republican praise for Trump’s customs plan, an extraordinary outflow, as GOP has long been defined by its zeal for free trade.

“Thanks, President Trump! Our country finally has a spokesman for American farmers, families and businesses in the White House! “Representative Randy Feenstra, an Iowa Republican who is proud to meet with farmers and families in each of the 36 counties he represents in the Northwest Corner of the State, wrote in a post on x Monday.

The message was sharply contrary to the one coming from larger groups representing farmers across the country who issued statements warning of serious impacts on the country’s food producers.

Republican senators were more muted – and some straightforward silent – in their answers.

Senator Chuck Grassley, another Iowa Republican, Monday morning Mr. Trump on social media To exclude Canadian Potash – a key ingredient in fertilizer – from the tariffs. A few hours later, Mr. Grassley what he called the “good news” That Mr. Trump had negotiated a break of a month on Customs with Mexico and said he hoped the deal is shadowing a decision with other trading partners.

“Hopefully negotiations will prevent more talk about customs,” Mr. Grassley.

Last time Mr. Trump was in office, he imposed duty in 2018 and 2019 of $ 300 billion Chinese imports to push China to negotiate a trade agreement with the United States. His action triggered a trade war between Washington and Beijing, where China relaxed retaliation gums on US products. China also moved more of its soybean purchases to Brazil and Argentina, a significant blow for us soybeans that had long been dependent on the Chinese market.

That resulted in billions of dollars of lost revenue for US farmers. To help offset the losses, Mr. Trump $ 23 billion In subsidies From a fund created by the Ministry of Agriculture To stabilize the courtyard sector. But this attempt to mitigate the injury was not considered a total success. Large agricultural operations and farmers in the south benefited most, which burned concern for justice, leaving some farmers who felt cheated.

Some Republicans have criticized the tariffs. Senator Rand Paul said mute: “Tariffs are simply treasure. Conservatives once united against new taxes. Taxation of trade means less trade and higher prices. “

And representative Don Bacon from Nebraska-there represents a left-wing Omaha-based district, making him one of the house’s most vulnerable members-spoken over the weekend that he was confused with Mr. Trump’s decision to target Canada and argued that he should focus instead of China and Russia.

Alan Rapport and Annie Karni contributed with reporting.