CBS to deliver ’60 minutes’ Kamala Harris interview ‘Unedited’ transcription to FCC; Here’s why

In the midst of US President Donald Trump’s $ 10 billion trial against CBS, the network has been forced to give the printout of an interview with former US VP Kamala Harris, which was completed before the election.

The Federal Communications Commission will receive the “full, unedited transcription and camera traffickers” by Harris’ interview conducted in October last year prior to the presidential election, Paramount-owned CBS News said.

In mid -October, the Center for American Rights filed a complaint that claimed that 60 minutes had intentionally edited the interview. However, the complaint was rejected before Trump’s second inauguration.

In a lawsuit filed with a federal court in Texas, Trump claimed that CBS News deliberately changed the interview to undermine him in the presidential election.

Trump appointed FCC President reopening the matter

Following Trump’s return to the White House, his newly appointed FCC chairman Brendan Carr reopened the case.

Harris’ answer to a question about the Israel-Hamas War offended the 47th President.

In a teaser sent on Margaret Brennan’s face the nation, Harris was seen and said her so -called “word salad” that was very different from the one actually sent.

The network justified its decision and claimed that they edited Harris’ long counter -movement due to the show’s time limit in an hour’s time. CBS News insisted that it is “not doctored.”

ALSO READ: Canadian hockey fans boo us national anthem in protest against Trump -Tolds rates

CBS NEWS REFUSE EXCEPTIONS MAKING IN $ 10 BILL

According to CBS News, Face the Nation Extractor and the 60 -minute episode contained the “same question, the same answer” that rejected the charges made in his $ 10 billion trial.

Meanwhile, Democratic FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez blasted her own agency for reopening the investigation and claimed it was “clear” that Trump blasted media that did not present him in a positive light.

“This is a retirement movement from the government against television stations whose content or cover is perceived as unfavorable,” she told the New York Times.