Clause Aston Villa ‘refused’ to insert Marco Asensios Loan Agreement

On By Littum

Aston Villa was perhaps the most exciting team that kept an eye on during the January transfer window.

In fact, Villan’s active was active in the winter transfer window throughout January and into early February when they secured some key signing.

Donyell Malen arrived at Aston Villa early in the window, while Marcus Rashford got a step to Villa after Rashford made it clear that he would leave Manchester United.

Axel Disasi also joined the villa towards the end of the transfer window after Tottenham tried to sign Disasi late in the day.

Marco Asensio was another late addition at Villa Park when he joined a loan.

When he talked about the transfer podcast, Duncan Castles has discussed Asensio’s move to Villa, and he says that Villans actually refused to insert an opportunity to buy into this agreement for an important reason.

Paris Saint-Germain's Spanish Spanish Forward #11 Marco Asensio looks at when he warms up before the French L1 football match between Paris Saint-Germain (...
Photo by Miguel Medina/AFP via Getty Images

Why Aston Villa refused the opportunity to buy Marco Asensio

According to Castles, Villa refused an opportunity to buy on the Asensio agreement due to the fact that PSG would have a loan fee in return.

Castles suggested that Villa would not have a loan fee due to some tight restrictions on PSR.

“A small detail of their negotiations last week, taking Marco Asensio from Paris Saint-Germain on loans. Instead of Joao Félix, they had been offered the two players, Unai Emery eagerly for both of them, Félix travels to Milan, Chelsea insisted that Milan pays 5.5 million euros as a loan fee, which was basically the amortization value of The five months you ‘I spend in Milan, “Castles said.

“PSG gives Asensio the opportunity to go to villa without a loan fee. Salary had to be fully paid. My guidance is that Villa asked for an opportunity to buy, to be included in this deal, but refused to take one when PSG insisted that if you want an opportunity to buy, you have to pay a loan fee for To get it. “

“Then again, it suggests that Aston Villa, despite the big, large takeover of John Duran, is still tight at their financial ceiling height. And we can also look at the six clubs involved in these PSR -Swap offers in the summer. Those you mentioned, Elliot Anderson, Omari Kellyman, etc .. ”

Aston Villa’s recent net expenses

Castles says Villa may be cutting it fine with regard to PSR at the moment and the numbers suggest that Villans is close to the line.

Despite not necessarily being the biggest or most successful club in Europe in recent years, villa is right up there with regard to Europe’s largest consumers.

Rank Club Income (£ m) Expenses (£ m) Balance (£ m)
1 Paris St-Germain (from) 348.47 884.96 -536.49
2 Manchester United (Eng) 204.11 688.27 -484.16
3 Chelsea FC (Eng) 457.20 939.86 -306.66
4 FC Barcelona (ESP) 528.66 833.78 -258.88
5 Tottenham Hotspur (Eng) 185.83 443.80 -258.00
6 Arsenal FC (Eng) 155.15 383.35 -211.18
7 Internazionale (ITA) 397.46 569.24 -207.00
8 Milan AC (Ita) 256.38 467.14 -200.76
9 Aston Villa (Eng) 187.63 359.90 -172.27
10 Everton FC (Eng) 343.90 544.60 -171.13
Data from Cies, Transfer Relationship Since 2015, Not Including January 2025

Aston Villa is right there next to some of Europe’s power centers in terms of expenses, and it may not be sustainable without breaking the newer, stricter, Premier League rules for expenses.

Of course, it has largely been money that is well used for villa. After all, they have qualified for the Champions League, but which, like Everton and Nottingham Forest, have learned in recent times, the Premier League does not take too kind of this kind to use these days.

Villa has an opportunity to buy Marcus Rashford in the summer, but they went up to the chance to do the same with Asensio because of the economy involved in this agreement.

Related topics